Man, I'm bored. Not much to pick from... some mags with pictures of cute chicks who have haircuts got old after a while.
All I can focus on is how horrifically ugly the "I support smacking your kids around" girl is. Do you think this was a way for That's Life magazine to pick a side without actually weighing in on the issue, or am I just over-thinking it? Like they tactically picked the most beat up looking face to deter readers from agreeing with her?
All I can focus on is how horrifically ugly the "I support smacking your kids around" girl is. Do you think this was a way for That's Life magazine to pick a side without actually weighing in on the issue, or am I just over-thinking it? Like they tactically picked the most beat up looking face to deter readers from agreeing with her?