techno raj wrote:Hah, I had the 180 degree opposite thought. The world has improved so much -- and I mean worldwide, not just America -- that longing for a utopia is less compelling (in the same way that religions that promise salvation in the afterlife have fewer adherents as real life becomes less and less bad). With my arm smarting from my first shot (way sooner than I would have expected, a year ago, to be getting it) I am a technology/future optimist right now. The future just keeps developing in very different ways than what past futurists expected.chrondog wrote:Not gonna find any argument from me there. The global reality we're living in means that quality of life is going to decrease for most Americans for generations.
Pretty wild take imo that the vaccine gives you techno optimism when the virus just killed 3 million people. But if your point of comparison is the 1918 flu you could make the argument that public health has improved from then. It's all relative.
I was also comparing the highs of middle class American wealth in the mid 20th century to now. Certainly there's going to be a lot better outcomes and more wealth for regular people as we continue to bring global citizens out of poverty, but for Americans who are used to doing very well things will not improve. I will have less opportunity/purchasing power than my parents, and my children will have even less than I do. That is the right way to be since this kind of Western living is ecologically unsustainable, but it doesn't mean it isn't a huge shock to lots of privileged Americans.
Wealth inequality and global capitalism is also diluting the benefits of these advances to working people. While we can certainly say that the latest vaccine development is a technological marvel, the profit-driven system of distributing it is literally letting a ton of people die to make sure it's economically viable. We can give credit to technology while realizing that is it not at all optimally distributed for public good. We could be doing even better.